Trail Of Tears Essays (823 words) - Political Philosophy, Politics

Trail Of Tears The Federalists vs. The Anti-Federalists When the revolutionary war was over, the American colonists had found themselves free of British domination. Due to the fact that they were free from British control, they wanted to create their own system of government where tyranny would be practically diminished. Originally, the separate states were connected by The Articles of Confederation. But this document gave the central government no power of their own. Because of this, the states had many problems in international politics since they had just found freedom and did not have the respect of other countries. This caused a lot of thinking and it was decided that a document needed to be created to strengthen the central government and at the same time ensuring the safety of the states. So came to be the constitution. The constitution brought about a division between the American people. These two groups were the federalists, who believed that the constitution was good, and the anti-federalists who thought that the constitution would not be able to protect the rights of the people. These two groups had conflicting views but together, they both wanted the same thing. The same thing was that America should be controlled by the people by the principles of federalism. Both groups, the federalist and anti-federalists recognized the fact that power was being abused. They witnessed what had happened in the war and that their had been negative effects of power and the result was very clear. British vocation had made them very aware of the threat of corruption. Therefore, they wanted to make a government that would ensure the duration of an just republic. The federalists exclaimed that the constitution was the only way they could reach this goal of a just society. As James Wilson had said, the constitution would not give all the power to the legislature unless it was legally written down to ensure power was not mistreated. In the constitution, it does allow congress to make laws that help out the government in the area of execution of foreign powers. The view of the anti-federalists were obviously different. They believed that the power given to the congress was not safe since it put them too much in control. Hence they created the Bill of Rights to establish justice, ensure domestic tranquillity and provide for the common defense... The anti-federalists feared that the actual people would not be fairly represented by their new government since they would have the power to get rid of the individual rights of the people. The Bill of Rights claims it is for and by the people. Especially since America is so large, it does not ensure everyone's opinion would be heard. Many people did not like the idea of having representatives from each state because one man can not bring forth many different opinions. Anti-federalists believe that liberty only is present when there are few people and they can actually get their voice projected. In a large population, like America, the citizens do not get individual freedom and are deprived of their rights. Yet, Madison a federalist stated that in a small republic, tyranny could be much more assessable since it would be easier to dominate others. Unlike in a large republic which is made up of many views where as it is less chance that a few can dominate others. Even in individual states it is easy to elect officials since people can be easily controlled when there aren't many people. In other word, the more the people, the less chance of bribery and inducement. Another benefit of a larger republic is that there would be a variety of people representing them and their would be many candidates to pick from. Ensuring the highest quality government. In a small republic, options would be very select making it an unfair election. Besides finding officials to best represent the people, there were many other controversial topics that faced the American people. The topic of taxation brought about many different ideas of what should be. The anti-federalists believed that by forming a new system would be very challenging because that is what they know and use. The first problem they found was that states would not want to have two state taxes. This is unfair to the people. They also argued that a state tax was unfair since each state was different with different needs. This could very well destroy a state economically while other states be fine. The federalists believed

Teaching Strategies in Study of Mathematic

Teaching Strategies in Study of Mathematic Educational strategies are the instructional methods and the learning activities used in imparting knowledge and skills to the learners. Mathematics being an abstract and empirical subject requires exciting ways to drive home the concepts and facts. To achieve this, mathematics teachers use several strategies which are not limited to gaming, problem-solving, group work, discussions, and research work.Advertising We will write a custom report sample on Teaching Strategies in Study of Mathematic specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Gaming is a strategy in which the teacher engages the students in games such as digital cards to solve problems. It helps develop psychomotor and communication skills of the learners even though time consuming. Problem-solving is a strategy in which the teacher illustrates using well done examples to the learners to guide them in organizing their solutions. It is more efficient in giving guidance to the learners in solving their problems but the strategy lacks in-depth analysis of the concept. Group work is a strategy in which the teacher organizes students into small groups to solve problems. It improves learner’s communication skills as well as participation. Discussion is a strategy in which the teacher simply gives guidance to the learners as they solve problems, it gives the students an opportunity to have a broader view of the concept as well as develop confidence. However, it is time consuming and leads to unequal participation. Research work is a strategy in which learners carry out further study to ascertain a concept or fact enabling them to have full mastery of the concept as they are able to extensively research. If mathematics were food, I would break it into small pieces, chew it, swallow it, and digest it. In breaking it, I would use problem-solving strategy in which I would give effective problem-solving solutions to the students to act as a basis upon which learners organize their solutions as well as their thinking. In chewing it, I would organize the students into small groups so that they mull over the problems and come up with appropriate responses which enhance students’ participation in class work. In swallowing it, I would conduct class discussion in which I would choose randomly a group to come forward to explain their response before the classmates; this enables the students to evaluate the solutions and arguments of their classmates by allowing them to voice their agreements or disagreements. This would go along way in ensuring full participation as they would actively listen to their classmates’ explanations. Lastly I would digest it, in so doing, I would instruct the learners to carry out further studies to enhance their thinking as well as have firm grasp of the concept. A first glimpse into mathematics education indicates practicality in nature as well as a necessity in life.Advertising Looking for report on education? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More This is well demonstrated from methodology to the learning activities implored in teaching it. It is a subject meant to improve the thinking ability of the learners due to its abstract nature. Not only does a quick look into the teaching aids attest to this, but also the subject content (Reys, Lindquist, Lambdin, Smith, 2009). Learning resources is part and parcel of the strategies used in teaching mathematics in form of models, regalia, maps, references, and diagrams. These tools assist learners to visualize and internalize the concept. As a teacher, effective delivery of content starts right at preparation. This places high significance in preparation commencing with mastery of the content accompanied by the teacher’s notes, reference materials, relevant teaching aids, and good classroom management during presentation of the content (Reys, Lindquist, Lambdin, Smith, 2009) . The resources help break down the content especially the abstract concepts into simpler bits which can be understood by the students. In the changing world, teaching mathematics needs a dynamic and flexible approach to accommodate these variances of technology and inventions. Teaching mathematics in primary employs gaming as a strategy. Games use natural sense of fun to impart concepts and facts. In the classroom, this is achieved by creating space for playing mathematics games or using digital cards. Besides games, use of colorful objects is also incorporated (Booker, Bond, Sparrow, Swan, 2010). These objects have the ability to help young learners learn about numbers easily as bright colors attract and hold their attention. References Booker, G., Bond, D., Sparrow, L., Swan, P. (2010). Teaching primary mathematics (4th edition). Frenchs Forest, NSW: Pearson Australia. Reys, R., Lindquist, M., Lambdin, D., Smith, N. (2009). Helping children learn mathematics (9th edition). New York: John Wiley Sons.Advertising We will write a custom report sample on Teaching Strategies in Study of Mathematic specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More